Data Analysis AustraliaSTRATEGIC INFORMATION CONSULTANTS
|
|||
Copyright © 2012
Data Analysis Australia |
Taking The Risk Out Of Customer Satisfaction
The ProblemThe Insurance Commission was appointed to manage RiskCover, the new self-insurance system approved by State Government, in 1996. RiskCover's responsibility was to completely change the way State Government agencies viewed risk management and insurance. Their mandate was to guide their customers through the transition to RiskCover, raise awareness on risk management, and initiate a new service and a new approach to customer service. RiskCover has clients across all State Government agencies. Their clients range from small agencies that have limited contact with RiskCover (for example the Albany Cemetery Board), to large agencies that have a sizeable number of claims (for example Fire and Emergency Services Authority). The level and type of risk faced by each agency needs to be understood. This is variable and not dependent on the size of the agency. Some agencies require minimal risk management advice and others require advice on more complex risk management issues. For example the Zoological Gardens Board will differ significantly in its major risks compared to the Treasury Department. From the first survey, it was considered essential to carry out the personal interviews with these clients, and to probe for the reasons behind satisfaction or dissatisfaction. The IssuesUnique features of the Insurance Commission that precluded a normal market research survey approach included:
With this background, RiskCover contracted Data Analysis Australia to assess customer satisfaction with RiskCover and the new operational management techniques. The Data Analysis Australia ApproachThe unique issues that faced the Insurance Commission could not be resolved with a standard market research survey. Some of the methods employed by Data Analysis Australia to ensure these issues were addressed included:
Survey ConstructionData Analysis Australia tailored a three tiered approach to measuring customer satisfaction, which consisted of three surveys of varying depth and length with the following stakeholder groups:
The methodology adopted included questions that varied from rating questions (ie on a scale of 1 to 5, please rate your satisfaction with...) to open-ended questions to provide reliable quantitative measures of satisfaction and performance, plus verbatim comments to expand issues. Rating questions were analysed using a statistical package such as SPSS and results from open-ended questions were incorporated into the report to show findings and achieve depth. The ResultThe resulting strategic recommendations have assisted the Insurance Commission in developing RiskCover into the highly successful fund that is operating today. Each year the survey has provided guidance on what the current issues are for the government agencies. A significant result of RiskCover's increased focus on customers and risk management has been an acknowledgement by government agencies that they have a responsibility to manage risk. This is a quantum change from the pre-RiskCover situation. It has also created the challenge for RiskCover to keep up with its customers increased expectations. A secondary benefit of the survey has been improved reporting for a number of other purposes, including annual reports and remuneration schemes. |
||