[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change;
who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)
Elijah Newren
newren at gmail.com
Tue Jun 26 08:24:57 WST 2007
On 6/22/07, Matthias Clasen <matthias.clasen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/22/07, Sven Neumann <sven at gimp.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
> >
> > > so far, my take on the issue is that PyGtk should adapt to that
> > > change by not using tooltips->tips_data_list
> >
> > I have attached a patch to
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449318 that removes access to
> > private GtkTooltips struct members from the pygtk bindings. I can't tell
> > if this will break any PyGTK apps but I guess that these bindings have
> > only been added for the sake of completeness.
> >
>
> Thats fine. Can we still please revert the field name change to make existing
> pygtk versions compile against 2.11.x ?
And is there any chance we could get a new tarball so we can release
GNOME 2.19.4?
Thanks!
More information about the pygtk
mailing list