[pygtk] How About a PyGtk Stable Release?

John Stowers john.stowers.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jul 9 11:32:56 WST 2010


On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:57 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 15:30, John Stowers <john.stowers.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > It would be great if we could do a PyGtk stable release to align with
> > the last gtk-2.0 release. I am happy to do this if no-one else wants to.
> 
> I guess you should go for it.

OK great. It would be appreciated if someone could review this branch

http://github.com/nzjrs/pygtk/compare/master...add-gtk-2.20-api

It is the API additions for Gtk-2.20. It should be uncontroversial.

I will push this in the next few days if no-one objects.

> 
> > Also, would it be worth numbering this release as pygtk-2.22? It would
> > be nice if the version numbers matched again. Although this might not be
> > worth the effort if the pygobject version number != the glib version
> > number.
> 
> I'm open to changing pygobject's versioning scheme if it helps.

OK cool. I will wait to see if anyone else voices an opinion first.

John

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tomeu
> 
> > John
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > python-hackers-list mailing list
> > python-hackers-list at gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/python-hackers-list
> >




More information about the pygtk mailing list