[pygtk] How About a PyGtk Stable Release?
john.stowers.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jul 9 11:32:56 WST 2010
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:57 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 15:30, John Stowers <john.stowers.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > It would be great if we could do a PyGtk stable release to align with
> > the last gtk-2.0 release. I am happy to do this if no-one else wants to.
> I guess you should go for it.
OK great. It would be appreciated if someone could review this branch
It is the API additions for Gtk-2.20. It should be uncontroversial.
I will push this in the next few days if no-one objects.
> > Also, would it be worth numbering this release as pygtk-2.22? It would
> > be nice if the version numbers matched again. Although this might not be
> > worth the effort if the pygobject version number != the glib version
> > number.
> I'm open to changing pygobject's versioning scheme if it helps.
OK cool. I will wait to see if anyone else voices an opinion first.
> > John
> > _______________________________________________
> > python-hackers-list mailing list
> > python-hackers-list at gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/python-hackers-list
More information about the pygtk